Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the sparkling domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home1/corvad/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home1/corvad/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6131) in /home1/corvad/public_html/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Initial Monthly Revenue for I-502 Businesses by Type and Tenure http://cannabisandsocialpolicy.org/2014_i502sales_tacticaltrends/ Academic, Policy and Industry Evolution Sun, 18 Jan 2015 02:33:58 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Jim MacRae http://cannabisandsocialpolicy.org/2014_i502sales_tacticaltrends/#comment-20317 Sun, 18 Jan 2015 02:33:58 +0000 http://cannabisandsocialpolicy.org/?p=2412#comment-20317 In reply to Mark Ziegler.

Mark: Check out the “Market Concentration So Far” article posted here on Jan 12th. It lists the top few producers through Nov 11.

I have all of the other data, and will consider incorporating your suggestions into the 2014 summary. Thank-you

]]> By: Mark Ziegler http://cannabisandsocialpolicy.org/2014_i502sales_tacticaltrends/#comment-20256 Wed, 14 Jan 2015 05:39:09 +0000 http://cannabisandsocialpolicy.org/?p=2412#comment-20256 I love the information. Do you have any graphs depicting individual producers, processors and retailers? Do we know who the top 5 were last year?

]]> By: The 3-M'S http://cannabisandsocialpolicy.org/2014_i502sales_tacticaltrends/#comment-20253 Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:52:32 +0000 http://cannabisandsocialpolicy.org/?p=2412#comment-20253 Thank You for the Graph and the information Jim, I think we are near 40,000 a month so far below the average, however we do enjoy somewhat low operating costs. Keep researching for us, and we will keep learning from your hard work!

]]> By: Kevin Oliver http://cannabisandsocialpolicy.org/2014_i502sales_tacticaltrends/#comment-20252 Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:23:34 +0000 http://cannabisandsocialpolicy.org/?p=2412#comment-20252 Fantastic representation, Jim! It shows how/where the money is flowing at a glance, among other things.

]]> By: Jim MacRae http://cannabisandsocialpolicy.org/2014_i502sales_tacticaltrends/#comment-20251 Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:08:57 +0000 http://cannabisandsocialpolicy.org/?p=2412#comment-20251 In reply to jeff gilmore.

Jeff: You are correct.
The largest dots are Tier 3, the middle dots Tier 2, and the teeny dots Tier 1. Solid lines have a linked processor. Dotted lines are producer-only.

The processor line is stand-alone processors only (with no linked producer).

Hope that makes it more clear.

]]> By: jeff gilmore http://cannabisandsocialpolicy.org/2014_i502sales_tacticaltrends/#comment-20250 Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:33:09 +0000 http://cannabisandsocialpolicy.org/?p=2412#comment-20250 graph is a bit confusing

]]> By: jeff gilmore http://cannabisandsocialpolicy.org/2014_i502sales_tacticaltrends/#comment-20249 Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:32:26 +0000 http://cannabisandsocialpolicy.org/?p=2412#comment-20249 in your graph I take it that the lines with the bigger dots are tier three and the lines with the smaller dots are tier two. ity is a bit unclear

]]>