Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the sparkling domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home1/corvad/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home1/corvad/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6131) in /home1/corvad/public_html/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: A Brief Commentary on MJBA’s David Rheins interview with Mark Kleiman http://cannabisandsocialpolicy.org/a-brief-commentary-on-mjbas-david-rheins-interview-with-mark-kleiman/ Academic, Policy and Industry Evolution Fri, 01 Apr 2016 09:48:08 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Josh McBroom http://cannabisandsocialpolicy.org/a-brief-commentary-on-mjbas-david-rheins-interview-with-mark-kleiman/#comment-23497 Fri, 01 Apr 2016 09:48:08 +0000 http://cannabisandsocialpolicy.org/?p=2933#comment-23497 Dom wrote: “Kleiman’s answer to [the question on excise tax] is really, really, really good. Three efficient statements with clear implications for How to Do it Better, although the third one still has an issue. Can you name it?”

I’ll raise my hand, teacher 🙂 I believe it has to do with his proposed tax being based on THC content, when we know there are high-CBD/low-THC cannabis strains/products that are a significant percentage of the 502 market. Additionally, I’ll throw out there “the entourage effect” being what we ACTUALLY feel while high (as opposed to JUST the effect of THC), thus meaning that some of the best, most-potent cannabis out there may NOT actually be crazy-high in THC content.

]]>